USDA REAP · Agricultural · Kansas

Kansas Farm Gets Non-Repayable Grant for Solar — Through a Program They'd Never Heard Of

Grant Amount$187K
Grant Share50%
ProgramUSDA REAP
PeriodFY2025
Illustrative example — composite of real deal patterns

The Problem: Financing Solar the Wrong Way

A 160-acre Kansas grain and livestock operation had been exploring solar for two years. Energy costs had increased significantly, and the operator had received quotes for a 280kW solar installation that would cover the majority of the farm's electrical demand. The project economics were strong — a 7–9 year payback at current utility rates.

The plan was to finance the installation through a conventional agricultural lender at approximately 8% interest. The operator had spoken with two commercial banks and received term sheet offers. Both were straightforward — no grants, full principal, 8% rate, 7-year term. Workable, but not optimal.

A Program Nobody Had Mentioned

The eligibility quiz asked about the business's primary financing goal, location, and whether it involved renewable energy. Based on the rural location and agricultural producer status, the quiz identified USDA REAP eligibility — a program that offers grants covering up to 50% of project costs with no repayment required, combined with loan guarantees for the remaining financing.

Neither commercial bank had mentioned REAP. Neither was familiar with the program. Agricultural producers are explicitly included in REAP eligibility — but the program operates through USDA Rural Development offices and USDA-approved lenders, not through the conventional agricultural lending channels the operator had been using.

The REAP Application

A REAP-approved lender was identified who had processed multiple agricultural solar applications in Kansas. The lender understood the program requirements, the technical feasibility documentation needed, and the quarterly application windows. The application was submitted in a FY2025 grant window.

The USDA REAP grant covered 50% of the eligible project cost — approximately $187,000 — with no repayment requirement. The remaining project cost was financed through a REAP loan guarantee at substantially better terms than the conventional quotes. Total effective cost of the solar installation was dramatically reduced compared to the original plan.

Note on FY2026: USDA REAP grant applications are currently paused while USDA reviews FY2026 program parameters. This case study reflects a FY2025 funded project. REAP loan guarantees remain available year-round. Applicants should position projects now and be ready to apply for grants when the window reopens.

Deal Summary

ProgramUSDA REAP (Rural Energy for America Program)
Grant amount$187,000 (approx. 50% of project)
Grant repaymentNone required
Project280kW solar installation
Applicant typeAgricultural producer — 160 acres
Funding periodFY2025
Original planConventional financing at 8% — no grant
REAP loan guarantee75% of remaining project cost
$187K grant approved — no repayment required · USDA REAP · FY2025

See yourself in this story?

Our quiz takes 60 seconds and matches you with a specialist who has closed deals like yours. If the first match doesn't work out, we find you another.

Take the Free Eligibility Quiz

This case study is an illustrative composite example based on real patterns observed in SBA and USDA lending. It does not represent a specific individual or transaction. Details including loan amounts, timelines, and business characteristics are representative of actual deal structures. SBALoansToday.co is an independent information and lead generation service.